Utilization of artificial intelligence in Men’s Health: Opportunities for innovation and quality improvement
Bajwa J, Munir U, Nori A, Williams B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthc J. 2021;8:e188–94.
Google Scholar
Venishetty N, Alkassis M, Raheem O. The role of artificial intelligence in male infertility: evaluation and treatment: a narrative review. Uro. 2024;4:23–35.
Google Scholar
Mouhawasse E, Haff CW, Kumar P, Lack B, Chu K, Bansal U, et al. Can AI chatbots accurately answer patient questions regarding vasectomies? Int J Impot Res. 2024;1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00970-y.
Razdan S, Siegal AR, Brewer Y, Sljivich M, Valenzuela RJ. Assessing chatGPT’s ability to answer questions pertaining to erectile dysfunction: can our patients trust it? Int J Impot Res. 2024;36:734–40.
Google Scholar
Sarker IH. Machine learning: algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. Sn Comput Sci. 2021;2:160.
Google Scholar
Agarwal A, Henkel R, Huang CC, Lee MS. Automation of human semen analysis using a novel artificial intelligence optical microscopic technology. Andrologia. 2019;51:e13440.
Google Scholar
Shah M, Naik N, Somani BK, Hameed BZ. Artificial intelligence (AI) in urology-current use and future directions: an iTRUE study. Turk J Urol. 2020;46:S27–39.
Google Scholar
Hanassab S, Nelson SM, Akbarov A, Yeung AC, Hramyka A, Alhamwi T, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence to identify follicles that optimize clinical outcomes during assisted conception. Nat Commun. 2025;16:296.
Google Scholar
Mora-Sánchez A, Aguilar-Salvador DI, Nowak I. Towards a gamete matching platform: using immunogenetics and artificial intelligence to predict recurrent miscarriage. Npj Digit Med. 2019;2:1–6.
Google Scholar
Tsai VF, Zhuang B, Pong YH, Hsieh JT, Chang HC. Web- and artificial intelligence–based image recognition for sperm motility analysis: verification study. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8:e20031.
Google Scholar
Chung PH, Han TM, Rudnik B, Das AK. Peyronie’s disease: what do we know and how do we treat it? Can J Urol. 2020;27:11–9.
Google Scholar
Muneer A. Hypogonadism: an underdiagnosed condition. Trends Urol Gynaecol Sex Health. 2010;15:14–7.
Google Scholar
Baldwin K, Ginsberg P, Harkaway RC. Under-reporting of erectile dysfunction among men with unrelated urologic conditions. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:87–9.
Google Scholar
Liang Y, Huang J, Zhao Q, Mo H, Su Z, Feng S, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence and trends of infertility among individuals of reproductive age (15–49 years) from 1990–2021, with projections to 2040. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2025;40:529–44.
Google Scholar
Leung AK, Henry MA, Mehta A. Gaps in male infertility health services research. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7:S303–9.
Google Scholar
Eisenberg ML, Esteves SC, Lamb DJ, Hotaling JM, Giwercman A, Hwang K, et al. Male infertility. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2023;9:49.
Google Scholar
Olisa NP, Campo-Engelstein L, Martins Da Silva S. Male infertility: what on earth is going on? Pilot international questionnaire study regarding clinical evaluation and fertility treatment for men. Reprod Fertil. 2022;3:207–15.
Google Scholar
Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ. 1992;305:609–13.
Google Scholar
Levine H, Jørgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, Jolles M, et al. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of samples collected globally in the 20th and 21st centuries. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;29:157–76.
Google Scholar
Sengupta P, Dutta S, Krajewska-Kulak E. The disappearing sperms: analysis of reports published between 1980 and 2015. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11:1279–304.
Google Scholar
CDC. National ART summary. 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 17]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/art/reports/2021/summary.html.
Gatimel N, Moreau J, Parinaud J, Léandri RD. Sperm morphology: assessment, pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and state of the art in 2017. Andrology. 2017;5:845–62.
Google Scholar
Bijar A, Benavent AP, Mikaeili M, Khayati R. Fully automatic identification and discrimination of sperm’s parts in microscopic images of stained human semen smear. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2012;05:384–95.
Google Scholar
Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Real‐time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF‐ICSI outcome. J Androl. 2002;23:1–8.
Google Scholar
Björndahl L, Kirkman Brown J. The sixth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen: ensuring quality and standardization in basic examination of human ejaculates. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:246–51.
Google Scholar
Czubaszek M, Andraszek K, Banaszewska D, Walczak-Jędrzejowska R. The effect of the staining technique on morphological and morphometric parameters of boar sperm. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0214243.
Google Scholar
Butola A, Popova D, Prasad DK, Ahmad A, Habib A, Tinguely JC, et al. High spatially sensitive quantitative phase imaging assisted with deep neural network for classification of human spermatozoa under stressed condition. Sci Rep. 2020;10:13118.
Google Scholar
Sahoo AJ, Kumar Y. Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods. Technol Health Care. 2014;22:531–45.
Google Scholar
Ilhan HO, Serbes G, Aydin N. Automated sperm morphology analysis approach using a directional masking technique. Comput Biol Med. 2020;122:103845.
Google Scholar
Finelli R, Leisegang K, Tumallapalli S, Henkel R, Agarwal A. The validity and reliability of computer-aided semen analyzers in performing semen analysis: a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10:3069–79.
Google Scholar
Yibre AM, Koçer B. Semen quality predictive model using feed forwarded neural network trained by learning-based artificial algae algorithm. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2021;24:310–8.
Parrella A, Rubio Riquelme N, Van Os Galdos LA, Vilella Amorós I, Jiménez Gadea M, Aizpurua J. P-110 a novel artificial intelligence microscopy: mojo AISA, the new way to perform semen analysis. Hum Reprod. 2022;37:deac107.106.
Google Scholar
Salih M, Austin C, Warty RR, Tiktin C, Rolnik DL, Momeni M, et al. Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023:hoad031.
Google Scholar
Berntsen J, Rimestad J, Lassen JT, Tran D, Kragh MF. Robust and generalizable embryo selection based on artificial intelligence and time-lapse image sequences. PloS ONE. 2022;17:e0262661.
Google Scholar
Borna MR, Sepehri MM, Maleki B. An artificial intelligence algorithm to select most viable embryos considering current process in IVF labs. Front Artif Intell. 2024;7:1375474.
Google Scholar
GhoshRoy D, Alvi PA, Santosh KC. Explainable AI to predict male fertility using extreme gradient boosting algorithm with SMOTE. Electronics. 2023;12:15.
Google Scholar
Javadi S, Mirroshandel SA. A novel deep learning method for automatic assessment of human sperm images. Comput Biol Med. 2019;109:182–94.
Google Scholar
Yüzkat M, Ilhan HO, Aydin N. Multi-model CNN fusion for sperm morphology analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2021;137:104790.
Google Scholar
Agarwal A, Baskaran S, Parekh N, Cho CL, Henkel R, Vij S, et al. Male infertility. Lancet Lond Engl. 2021;397:319–33.
Google Scholar
AlZoubi O, Abu Awad M, Abdalla AM, Samrraie L. Varicocele detection in ultrasound images using deep learning. Multimed Tools Appl. 2024;83:63617–34.
Google Scholar
Kayra MV, Şahin A, Toksöz S, Serindere M, Altıntaş E, Özer H, et al. Machine learning-based classification of varicocoele grading: a promising approach for diagnosis and treatment optimization. Andrology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13776.
Ory J, Tradewell MB, Blankstein U, Lima TF, Nackeeran S, Gonzalez DC, et al. Artificial intelligence based machine learning models predict sperm parameter upgrading after varicocele repair: a multi-institutional analysis. World J Mens Health. 2022;40:618–26.
Google Scholar
Crafa A, Russo M, Cannarella R, Gül M, Compagnone M, Mongioì LM, et al. Predictability of varicocele repair success: preliminary results of a machine learning-based approach. Asian J Androl. 2024;27:52–8.
Google Scholar
Pellegrino F, Sjoberg DD, Tin AL, Benfante NE, Briganti A, Montorsi F, et al. Relationship between age, comorbidity, and the prevalence of erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;9:162.
Google Scholar
Lin H, Zhao L, Wu H, Cao M, Jiang H. Sexual life and medication taking behaviours in young men: an online survey of 92 620 respondents in China. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;74:e13417.
Google Scholar
Şahin MF, Ateş H, Keleş A, Özcan R, Doğan Ç, Akgül M, et al. Responses of five different artificial intelligence chatbots to the top searched queries about erectile dysfunction: a comparative analysis. J Med Syst. 2024;48:38.
Google Scholar
Baturu M, Solakhan M, Kazaz TG, Bayrak O. Frequently asked questions on erectile dysfunction: evaluating artificial intelligence answers with expert mentorship. Int J Impot Res. 2025;37:310–4.
Google Scholar
Chen XY, Lu WT, Zhang D, Tan MY, Qin X. Development and validation of a prediction model for ED using machine learning: according to NHANES 2001–2004. Sci Rep. 2024;14:27279.
Google Scholar
Glavaš S, Valenčić L, Trbojević N, Tomašić AM, Turčić N, Tibauth S, et al. Erectile function in cardiovascular patients: its significance and a quick assessment using a visual-scale questionnaire. Acta Cardiol. 2015;70:712–9.
Google Scholar
Chen YF, Lin CS, Hong CF, Lee DJ, Sun C, Lin HH. Design of a clinical decision support system for predicting erectile dysfunction in men using NHIRD dataset. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019;23:2127–37.
Google Scholar
Oh JH, Kerns S, Ostrer H, Powell SN, Rosenstein B, Deasy JO. Computational methods using genome-wide association studies to predict radiotherapy complications and to identify correlative molecular processes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43381.
Google Scholar
Hasannejadasl H, Roumen C, Poel van der H, Vanneste B, Roermund van J, Aben K, et al. Development and external validation of multivariate prediction models for erectile dysfunction in men with localized prostate cancer. PLOS ONE. 2023;18:e0276815.
Google Scholar
Agochukwu-Mmonu N, Murali A, Wittmann D, Denton B, Dunn RL, Montie J, et al. Development and validation of dynamic multivariate prediction models of sexual function recovery in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy: results from the MUSIC statewide collaborative. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;40:1.
Google Scholar
Saikali S, Reddy S, Gokaraju M, Goldsztein N, Dyer A, Gamal A, et al. Development and assessment of an AI-based machine learning model for predicting urinary continence and erectile function recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: insights from a prostate cancer referral center. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025;259:108522.
Google Scholar
Rew KT, Heidelbaugh JJ. Erectile dysfunction. Am Fam Physician. 2016;94:820–7.
Google Scholar
Gorek M, Stief CG, Hartung C, Jonas U. Computer-assisted interpretation of electromyograms of corpora cavernosa using fuzzy logic. World J Urol. 1997;15:65–70.
Google Scholar
Kellner B, Stief CG, Hinrichs H, Hartung C. Computerized classification of corpus cavernosum electromyogram signals by the use of discriminant analysis and artificial neural networks to support diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. Urol Res. 2000;28:6–13.
Google Scholar
Kim YH. Artificial intelligence in medical ultrasonography: driving on an unpaved road. Ultrasonography. 2021;40:313.
Google Scholar
Li L, Fan W, Li J, Li Q, Wang J, Fan Y, et al. Abnormal brain structure as a potential biomarker for venous erectile dysfunction: evidence from multimodal MRI and machine learning. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3789–800.
Google Scholar
Smerina DR, Pearlman AM. The intersection of artificial intelligence, wearable devices, and sexual medicine. Curr Urol Rep. 2024;26:14.
Google Scholar
Ogrinc FG, Linet OI. Evaluation of real-time RigiScan monitoring in pharmacological erection. J Urol. 1995;154:1356–9.
Google Scholar
Heo Y, Kim J, Cha C, Shin K, Roh J, Jo J. Wearable E-textile and CNT sensor wireless measurement system for real-time penile erection monitoring. Sensors. 2021;22:231.
Google Scholar
Konstantinidis DRCV, Alexandrou S, Alexandrou M, Raheem AA. Adam sensor: a novel nocturnal penile tumescence wearable device – technology overview & applications. J Sex Med. 2022;19:S133–4.
Google Scholar
Sng CMN, Wee LMC, Tang KC, Lee KCJ, Wu QH, Yeo JC, et al. Wearable soft microtube sensors for quantitative home-based erectile dysfunction monitoring. Sensors. 2022;22:9344.
Google Scholar
Saffati G, Orozco Rendon D, Daily R, Khera M, Justin E. (039) Erection duration and firmness: a descriptive analysis from a population-based study. J Sex Med. 2024;21:qdae161.032.
Google Scholar
Lange M, Charles D, Kazeem A, Jones M, Sun F, Ghosal S, et al. Is low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction a durable treatment option?-long-term outcomes of a randomized sham-controlled trial. Transl Androl Urol. 2024;13:2194–200.
Google Scholar
Lee M, Sharifi R. Non-invasive management options for erectile dysfunction when a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor fails. Drugs Aging. 2018;35:175–87.
Google Scholar
Jang I, Lee JU, Lee JM, Kim BH, Moon B, Hong J, et al. LC–MS/MS software for screening unknown erectile dysfunction drugs and analogues: artificial neural network classification, peak-count scoring, simple similarity search, and hybrid similarity search algorithms. Anal Chem. 2019;91:9119–28.
Google Scholar
Yang R, Liu C, Li Q, Wang W, Wu B, Chen A, et al. Artificial intelligence based identification of the functional role of hirudin in diabetic erectile dysfunction treatment. Pharmacol Res. 2021;163:105244.
Google Scholar
Furtado TP, Osadchiy V, Eleswarapu SV. The promise of artificial intelligence in Peyronie’s disease. Curr Urol Rep. 2025;26:3.
Google Scholar
Al-Thakafi S, Al-Hathal N. Peyronie’s disease: a literature review on epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology, diagnosis and work-up. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:280–9.
Google Scholar
Levine LA. Advancements and challenges in Peyronie’s disease: a personal journey and current perspectives. Int J Impot Res. 2024;36:105–6.
Google Scholar
Baray SB, Abdelmoniem M, Mahmud S, Kabir S, Faisal MAA, Chowdhury MEH, et al. Automated measurement of penile curvature using deep learning-based novel quantification method. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1149318.
Google Scholar
Abbas TO, AbdelMoniem M, Chowdhury MEH. Automated quantification of penile curvature using artificial intelligence. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5:954497.
Google Scholar
Walker DT, Jiang T, Santamaria A, Osadchiy V, Daniels D, Sturm RM, et al. 3D-printed phantoms to quantify accuracy and variability of goniometric and volumetric assessment of Peyronie’s disease deformities. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:786–9.
Google Scholar
Siapno AED, Yi BC, Daniels D, Bolagani A, Kwan L, Walker D, et al. Measurement accuracy of 3-Dimensional mapping technologies versus standard goniometry for angle assessment. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16:547–54.
Google Scholar
Tostain JL, Blanc F. Testosterone deficiency: a common, unrecognized syndrome. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5:388–96.
Google Scholar
David J, Charles A. Barriers to diagnosis and accessing effective treatment and support for testosterone deficiency. J Mens Health. 2024;20:62–71.
Hartman-Kenzler J, Torres J, Alami-Harandi A, Miller C, Park J, Berg W. MP47-13 CHATGPT explains testosterone therapy: accurate answers with questionable references. J Urol. 2024;211:e768.
Google Scholar
Pabla H, Lange A, Nadiminty N, Sindhwani P. Responses of artificial intelligence chatbots to testosterone replacement therapy: patients beware! Société Int D’Urologie J. 2025;6:13.
Google Scholar
Kim JW, Moon DG. Optimizing aging male symptom questionnaire through genetic algorithms based machine learning techniques. World J Mens Health. 2020;39:139.
Google Scholar
American Urological Association. Testosterone deficiency guideline. 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 21]. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/guidelines/testosterone-deficiency-guideline.
Lu T, Hu YH, Tsai CF, Liu SP, Chen PL. Applying machine learning techniques to the identification of late-onset hypogonadism in elderly men. SpringerPlus. 2016;5:729.
Google Scholar
Novaes MT, Ferreira de Carvalho OL, Guimarães Ferreira PH, Nunes Tiraboschi TL, Silva CS, Zambrano JC, et al. Prediction of secondary testosterone deficiency using machine learning: a comparative analysis of ensemble and base classifiers, probability calibration, and sampling strategies in a slightly imbalanced dataset. Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;23:100538.
Google Scholar
Şahin MF, Keleş A, Özcan R, Doğan Ç, Topkaç EC, Akgül M, et al. Evaluation of information accuracy and clarity: chatGPT responses to the most frequently asked questions about premature ejaculation. Sex Med. 2024;12:qfae036.
Google Scholar
Athanasiadis L. Premature ejaculation: is it a biogenic or a psychogenic disorder? J Sex Marital Ther. 1998;13:241–55.
Google Scholar
Anıl H, Kayra MV. The digital dialogue on premature ejaculation: evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence-driven responses. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04461-x.
Carlson JA, Cheng RZ, Lange A, Nagalakshmi N, Rabets J, Shah T, et al. Accuracy and readability of artificial intelligence chatbot responses to vasectomy-related questions: public beware. Cureus. 2024;16:e67996.
Google Scholar
Chung D, Sidhom K, Dhillon H, Bal DS, Fidel MG, Jawanda G, et al. Real-world utility of chatGPT in pre-vasectomy counselling, a safe and efficient practice: a prospective single-centre clinical study. World J Urol. 2024;43:32.
Google Scholar
Esmaeilzadeh P. Challenges and strategies for wide-scale artificial intelligence (AI) deployment in healthcare practices: a perspective for healthcare organizations. Artif Intell Med. 2024;151:102861.
Google Scholar
Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:689.
Google Scholar
Maleki Varnosfaderani S, Forouzanfar M. The role of AI in hospitals and clinics: transforming healthcare in the 21st century. Bioengineering. 2024;11:337.
Google Scholar
American Urological Association. Guidelines & quality. 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 4]. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality.
Rodler S. Artificial intelligence importance of guidelines to ensure transparency and reproducibility of artificial intelligence interventions – American urological association. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 18]. Available from: https://auanews.net/issues/articles/2024/february-extra-2024/artificial-intelligence-importance-of-guidelines-to-ensure-transparency-and-reproducibility-of-artificial-intelligence-interventions.
American Medical Association. AMA: physicians enthusiastic but cautious about health care AI. 2023 [cited 2024 Nov 3]. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-physicians-enthusiastic-cautious-about-health-care-ai.
Laitinen A, Sahlgren O. AI systems and respect for human autonomy. Front Artif Intell. 2021;4:705164.
Google Scholar
Murdoch B. Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22:122.
Google Scholar
Mittermaier M, Raza MM, Kvedar JC. Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies. Npj Digit Med. 2023;6:1–3.
Google Scholar
Dankwa-Mullan I. Health equity and ethical considerations in using artificial intelligence in public health and medicine. Prev Chronic Dis. 2024;21:E64.
Google Scholar
Ali S, Abuhmed T, El-Sappagh S, Muhammad K, Alonso-Moral JM, Confalonieri R, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): what we know and what is left to attain trustworthy artificial intelligence. Inf Fusion. 2023;99:101805.
Google Scholar
link
